Montana clinics that restrict pre-access to the pill for abortion

Misula, Mont. – Four states bordering Montana have “trigger laws” in effect or pending that the U.S. Supreme Court has ended federal protection for abortion, making the conservative Big Sky Country an unlikely haven for women seeking to terminate their pregnancies.

But the chances of Montana becoming an abortion shelter have dwindled – not by lawmakers and governors whose efforts to restrict abortions have been hampered by the state constitution’s right to privacy, but by the operators of at least four of the state’s five clinics who can get abortion pills in advance.

Officials at the Planned Parenthood of Montana, which operates three of the four clinics, say the goal is to ensure that they and their patients from the state, including trigger bans – are prohibited or restricted by abortion laws that were designed to take effect. Rowe vs. Wade Has been injured – protected from criminal charges and lawsuits. But policy changes are another complication for women in neighboring states like South Dakota, who want to end pregnancies and face a rapidly narrowing field of options.

“It was a state we hoped it would be found,” said Kim Floren, director of the Justice Through Empowerment Network, a South Dakota abortion fund that provides financial assistance to people in need of abortion. “Right now, it’s worse news on top of worse news.”

Patients often prefer drug abortions over abortion procedures because they are cheaper, take less time to the clinic and offer them more privacy and more control. The most common type of drug abortion is a two-part pill procedure: if a personal visit is required, the first doses are taken at the clinic; The second, usually at home. In many states, medications may be sent to the patient after a telemedicine appointment.

In 2020, drug abortions accounted for more than half of all abortions in the United States for the first time, according to the Gutmachar Institute, a research organization that supports the right to abortion. Advocates hope that drug abortion will become the goal of the new state law. In South Dakota, a law banning abortion through telemedicine went into effect July 1.

The change in Planned Parenthood policy in Montana is a response to changes in the legal landscape, said Jennifer Sandman, public policy lawsuit for the National Agency for Planned Parenthood and senior director of law. “People are working in a state of extraordinary chaos and fear that the Supreme Court has abandoned us and in some states has been aroused by threats from anti-abortion politicians,” Sandman said.

Montana’s Planned Parenthood decided June 30 that abortion pills at their clinics in Billings, Great Falls and Helena would not be given to patients in states where trigger laws have been enacted. At the time, bans were in place in South Dakota, Arkansas, Missouri and Oklahoma, but Planned Parenthood officials said they saw a significant number of patients from South Dakota. Officials did not respond when asked how many South Dakota patients would be infected.

Montana’s other neighbors – Idaho, Wyoming and North Dakota – also have trigger laws, but they have not yet been enacted.

Martha Fuller, president of Montana Planned Parenthood, wrote in an internal memo that the risks of cross-state provision of services were unclear, citing concerns about the potential for civil and criminal action against drug suppliers that terminate human pregnancies. From states with effective sanctions. The memo was posted on Twitter by a freelance journalist and was later deleted. Planned Parenthood officials have confirmed the policy change.

Montana’s three planned parenthood clinics will continue to provide abortion procedures to residents outside the state. “At the moment, we believe this is the best way to ensure that out-of-state patients are not intimidated and intimidated by extreme anti-abortion politicians into accessing their much-needed follow-up care,” said Laura Terrell, a spokeswoman for Montana Planned Parenthood.

The planned parental decision came just days after Missoulia reported that Missoula’s Blue Mountain Clinic would only offer drug abortions to people with Montana addresses. Clinic officials did not answer questions by phone or email.

The fifth clinic to provide abortions in Montana, Whitefish’s All Family Healthcare, declined to answer questions about its policy for out-of-state patients.

Fuller said in his memo that the planned parental policy may change as the legal risks have become clear. The memo did not mention that Montana’s status as a state with legal access to abortion could change soon.

Montana’s Republican-majority legislature and Republican governor passed four state laws to limit abortion in 2021, but three were blocked by a judge who quoted a 1999 state Supreme Court ruling as saying abortion was a right under the Montana constitution. State Attorney General Montana is urging the Supreme Court to reverse that precedent and enforce the laws. There is a pending decision.

The Montana Chapter is not the only planned parent network that is temporarily changing its policy on abortion pills due to the chaotic consequences of the Supreme Court’s action. Planned Parenthood North Central States, which arranges drug abortions in Minnesota, Iowa and Nebraska, says its patients must take the pill in states where abortion is legal.

South Dakota Trigger Act It is a crime to prescribe or administer a substance that causes abortion, but it does not target aborted people. Floren, of the Justice Through Empowerment Network, said there were still fears that South Dakotans could be investigated or charged if they were caught with pills in the state or had to go to their medical provider because of a complication. “A lot of people really like that method and now it’s taking people’s choices again,” he said.

Providers in other states that have become islands for legal abortion do not agree with policies restricting access to out-of-state patients. In Colorado, Dr. Nancy Fang, an OB-GYN at Denver’s Comprehensive Women’s Health Center, said she understands caution in the face of the uncertainty surrounding the state’s abortion ban. But, he said, restricting access would hurt patients and increase pressure on other clinics that continue to provide drug abortions.

“I think it’s really influential on the patient because it further limits their autonomy for access to healthcare, not being able to access a safe alternative based on where they are coming from,” Fang says.

Parenthood of the Rocky Mountain, planned in parts of Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming and Nevada, does not plan to change its policies, although spokesman leader Meltzer said his organization supports other partners such as Montana to make “heartbreaking decisions.”

“We serve all patients equally, those who live in our own community and those who escape from the abominable restrictions in their own state,” Meltzer said.

Abortion methods are considered to be more effective than abortion pills, although they are more aggressive by their nature. The procedure requires the patient’s cervix to be dilated using surgical equipment, and patients often take anti-anxiety medications or intravenous sedatives. With pills, those who have been abused by their partners may say they have had an abortion, since the amount of bleeding and other symptoms are similar.

As Planned Parenthood restricts the distribution of abortion pills in Montana, an organization called Just the Pill plans to expand. Patients can make telehealth appointments with medical providers from Just the Peel and then take the pills in Montana, Minnesota, Wyoming or Colorado.

Following the Supreme Court decision, the agency said it would send a fleet of mobile clinics to state lines to provide services to women in the states, including abortion restrictions. “By working at state borders, we will reduce the burden of patient travel to states with restrictions or severe limits,” the company said in a statement.

Floren said he hopes Just the Peel will continue to provide services for South Dakotans. The Justice Through Empowerment Network has seen an influx of grants and volunteers, and Floren says the abortion fund is preparing to organize people to attend the upcoming special legislature session where she hopes lawmakers will target abortion aid donors or distributors.

KHN correspondent Rai Ellen Beechel and reporter Erica Zurek contributed to this report.

Related topics

Contact us Submit a story tip

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.